Tim Maly of Quiet Babylon and Nicola Twilley of Edible Geography have both jumped into the Glacier/Island/Storm blogathon unfolding this week with posts about, respectively, questions of island sovereignty, national borders, data havens, geo-preservation and more, and, at Edible Geography, specialty ices developed for the boutique cocktail trade.
[Image: The Okinotori Islands—or are they reefs? Image via Tim Maly].
Tim’s post—which you should read in full—brings to mind recent moves by the Australian government to “excise” distant islands so as to prevent illegal immigrants from reaching what would otherwise legally recognized as Australian land.
The whole legislative exercise falls somewhere between a managed retreat of territorial sovereignty and a particularly Kafka-esque interpretation of Zeno’s paradox.
In Kafka’s short story “A Message from the Emperor,” for instance, we read that an imperial messenger, instructed to deliver the dying emperor’s final wish to a recipient far away, finds himself unable to travel anywhere at all. Indeed, as he struggles to make his way through endless crowds and palace antechambers, fighting his way toward a destination that was, at best, unclear, “how futile are all his efforts,” we read.
He is still forcing his way through the private rooms of the innermost palace. Never will he win his way through. And if he did manage that, nothing would have been achieved. He would have to fight his way down the steps, and, if he managed to do that, nothing would have been achieved. He would have to stride through the courtyards, and after the courtyards through the second palace encircling the first, and, then again, through stairs and courtyards, and then, once again, a palace, and so on for thousands of years.
Now reverse this. Imagine someone—a subject of the empire—trying to force his or her way back to the center, trying against overwhelming odds to reach the very epicenter of sovereign power, but utterly unable to succeed.
There is always another courtyard to cross; always more rooms to run through.
Now imagine this being played out on a South Pacific archipelago, where you are up against a sovereign state that insists on “excising” bits and bobs of its outer territory in order to sabotage your own best efforts to get somewhere. You step onto one island, secure in what you think is arrival, only to be told that, no, this is not yet Australia. You are both here and not here. This island is us—but it is also something we have legally abandoned.
So you move on to the next island—and the next, and the next.
The territorial complexities of sovereign governance thus rapidly spiral into clouds of uncertainty.
[Image: Map of Christmas Island].
According to The Age, an Australian newspaper, “the Howard government removed about 4,600 islands from the migration zone in 2005, preventing boat people who land there from accessing Australian law and claiming asylum in Australia.” The “migration zone” referred to here includes Christmas Island, which now—in 2010—falls into a strange grey zone of legality; from the perspective of an arriving immigrant, it both is and is not Australia.
This is what architect Ed Keller might call the political science fiction of excised island terrain.
I’m reminded of China Miéville’s recent novel The City & The City, in which differently controlled but spatially overlapping urban territories have been marbled into and through one another; you can physically stand in two cities at once, yet only legally be present in one at any given time.
Now blow Miéville’s strange in-and-out status up to the scale of a South Pacific archipelago and you have something approximating the spatial logic of Australian territorial law as applied to commonly used immigration routes.
Read the actual, island-excising Parliamentary documentation here.
[Image: Photo by Melissa Hom for New York Magazine].
Nicola Twilley, meanwhile, studies “detailed instructions for artificial glacier construction,” suggesting that “vernacular Himalayan glacier grafting techniques” might actually “have the potential to revolutionize the cocktails of tomorrow.”
In other words, artificial glaciers grown and maintained by specialty cocktail bars could be produced to order, made to include “orchid flowers, raspberries, or espresso beans,” Nicola writes, thus creating “flavor-accented glaciers.” These could then be chopped down into “berry-studded chunks,” rough cubes that supply “the perfect finishing touch for a Brownie Cognac or Irish coffee.”
“The theatrical potential of custom artificial glaciers,” she jokes, “might be second only to the champagne fountain.”
[Images: Photos by Melissa Hom for New York Magazine].
These are only the two most recent posts in a week full of linked conversations exploring the Glacier/Island/Storm studio at Columbia University. Here is a list of those relevant posts, if you’re interested:
Edible Geography: The Ice Program
Quiet Babylon: Islands in the Net
BLDGBLOG: Vincent Van Gogh and the Storm Archive
BLDGBLOG: Geothermal Gardens and the Hot Zones of the City
mammoth, a glacier is a very long event
InfraNet Lab, LandFab, or Manufacturing Terrain
Nick Sowers, Design to Fail
4 thoughts on “Excised Islands / Gourmet Cocktail”
Geoff – Hello my friend. Hope you are well. You might find these lovely ice paintings of interest by my other lovely friend Laura Frankstone. One of these will appear on the cover of my next book out soon.
Hey Jeffery! Great to hear from you. Congrats on the new book, and on the use of those beautiful paintings, as well.
I wonder at which point an island doens't feel like an island anymore, like Manhattan.
Do the denizens of industrialized Taiwan feel like islanders?
Is the "island" distinction solely due to size and the level of development?
Australian national identity is closely allied with the concept of it being the only "island continent." Is island-ness just a geopolitical/cultural construct?
InfraNet Lab mentioned Deleuze's "Desert Islands" essay. Deleuze writes "the essence of the deserted island is imaginary and not actual, mythological and not geographical." And then, "that an island is deserted must appear philosophically normal to us…That England is populated will always come as a surprise; humans can live on an island only by forgetting what an island represents."
Hi Geoff – the posts thus far have raised some really great questions and overarching themes for contemplating such design activities. I especially was drawn to Quiet Babylon Islands in the Net and Nick Sowers Design To Fail.
Nick Sowers speaks of an interest "in the flexibility and intrigue that emerges from a project deemed to be of no use. I am interested in the by-products of failure" and Quiet Babylon on "Building for Abandonment".
Both articles touch on the experimental and the speculative and the role that architects play in this process. As a studio almost without precedent, this approach is refreshing in a design based environment to test and push the borders of the discipline of architecture.
I keep thinking of the Hadron Collider – obviously not an architectural example, yet it has an amazingly beautiful aesthetic (http://www.stfc.ac.uk/resources/image/HadronColliderLg.jpg). The publicity this machine has received is both positive and negative – without going into these topics in detail, I think it would be safe to say that it questions the role of the human undertaking the experiment within the world scale, in a similar way climate modification that we are exploring.
In the same way it came to a shock for me to hear about the artificial reef building in Japan for political sovereignty, as I was only aware of these technologies being used to save the environment via eco-reefs. It is interesting to consider that the perceived use of these technologies may not always be known at the outset of design.
Climate modification technologies also are embedded within a multi-disciplined approach between many fields – for example science, politics, law, and engineering. What is an architect’s role in this? What specific skills of the architect are required?
It is of continuing interest to me to question the role of the designer in this process, with less emphasis on the ‘architect as god’ stereotypes and more on the boundaries of design, and the control we actually have when experimenting with the new and unknown technologies… I will continue to think through these questions as the semester continues.